Blog: Tag: student support systems

Supporting Military-Connected Students in Schools: A Framework for Success

Learning, question and hands raised with girl in classroom for education, discussion and knowledge. Help, studying and teacher with children and woman at school for why, scholarship and answer

Most educators agree that supporting military-connected students is important. However, even with an available and growing collection of tips, toolkits, and resources, these efforts can lose momentum and/or lack cohesion over time. Schools often face challenges sustaining change, particularly when supports are not embedded into systems or reinforced through structured planning. For schools that are committed to making meaningful, lasting improvements, applying a research-based change model may offer the direction needed to translate intention into impact.

The Lippitt-Knoster Model for Managing Complex Change offers a framework that is grounded in organizational change theory. It identifies six key components necessary for successful and sustainable change: vision, consensus, skills, incentives, resources, and an action plan. When applied intentionally, these elements can help schools build an environment where military-connected students are consistently and effectively supported.

Why Supporting Military-Connected Students Matters

Military-connected students do not just attend schools located near installations. They are present in nearly every state and in many communities due to a variety of reasons, such as a parent’s retirement, a temporary relocation during a parent’s deployment, or a parent’s service in the National Guard or Reserves. These students often face challenging experiences such as school transitions, caregiver changes, and parental absences. Such changes can interfere with students’ academic continuity, social development, and emotional well-being. While these experiences are common among military-connected students, they are not exclusive to them. Many students face instability, separation from family members, or unexpected life changes. This overlap underscores the broader value of designing systems that intentionally support military-connected students. Doing so can lead to stronger practices that benefit all students as they navigate uncertainty.

Vision: Establishing a Clear Purpose

Developing and using a vision, which can include long- and short-term goals and/or guidance for strategic decision-making, provide the foundation for all coordinated school-based efforts. Establishing and adhering to a clearly articulated vision for supporting military-connected students can help ensure strategies are aligned with school-wide goals and frameworks, such as Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS). Vision, within the educational system, might include a commitment to identifying military-connected students upon enrollment, developing protocols for supporting transitions, or ensuring access to academic and mental health resources. Anchoring this work in the broader mission of the school promotes integration rather than isolation of military-connected initiatives.

Resource Spotlight: Mitigating the Impact of School Mobility: An Effective Practices Model and Guide for Educators by the Center for Public Research and Leadership at Columbia University helps schools establish a clear and actionable vision for supporting military-connected students. Rooted in research and developed through collaboration with educators nationwide, this guide outlines the academic and socioemotional risks of school mobility and introduces a comprehensive Mobility Mitigation Model. The model provides a systemic approach to school transitions by offering structured strategies across all phases—from pre-move planning to post-enrollment support. The guide includes adaptable tools, self-assessment rubrics, and a theory of action, and using these instruments can help school leaders embed military-connected supports into their broader mission. This resource could be important for schools that intend to move from fragmented practices to a unified, sustainable vision of support.

Consensus: Building a Supportive School Culture

Sustainable change requires buy-in from all stakeholders. Consensus ensures that educators, administrators, and school staff are aware of the vision and understand their role in advancing it. One evidence-informed method for building consensus is data storytelling. When schools use local data to contextualize the needs of military-connected students—such as differences in attendance, discipline referrals, or academic outcomes—they can generate urgency and foster empathy. Framing these data within the broader narrative of student success helps align stakeholder priorities and reinforces a shared purpose.

Resource Spotlight: Edutopia’s guide to consensus-building strategies for school leaders provides tools school leaders can use to engage diverse audiences in meaningful decision-making. These strategies are directly aligned with the Lippitt-Knoster element of consensus and offer practical techniques for presenting school data in compelling ways and for developing a shared understanding among staff and stakeholders.

Skills: Equipping Educators with the Right Tools

Without adequate training, staff may feel ill-prepared to support military-connected students. The Lippitt-Knoster Model emphasizes that skill gaps can lead to anxiety or confusion and can, ultimately, undermine implementation. Professional learning opportunities for educators should focus on the following: building awareness of military culture, understanding the common challenges faced by military families, and equipping staff to respond with evidence-based strategies. Training should be embedded in ongoing professional development cycles, and it should not be offered as one-time events in order to support capacity building and sustainability.

Resource Spotlight: The Clearinghouse for Military Family Readiness at Penn State (Clearinghouse) offers a series of training modules on supporting military-connected students. These modules include evidence-informed practices and frameworks that build educator capacity and address knowledge gaps around military culture and effective school-based interventions. This resource directly supports the development of skills necessary to implement and maintain effective programming for all students, especially military-connected students.

Incentives: Encouraging Buy-In

For change to be sustained, individuals must perceive value in their participation. Incentives, as conceptualized in the model, do not need to be monetary. Recognizing staff who demonstrate excellence in supporting military-connected students, celebrating student successes, or using data to highlight improvements are all ways to reinforce engagement. When educators see that their efforts produce tangible results, whether through improved student outcomes or a more inclusive school culture, they are more likely to continue investing their time, expertise, and energy.

Resource Spotlight: A recent professional learning literature review conducted by the Clearinghouse explores what educators report motivates them to engage in military-connected training. This resource helps school leaders understand what types of supports are valued by staff and how to structure professional development in ways that foster continued buy-in, which is key to sustaining momentum and investment.

Resources: Providing Support Systems

Change cannot be sustained without access to resources, even if a school has a strong vision and a motivated team. These resources include tools for identification, access to training, time for collaboration, and evidence-based intervention materials. The absence of these resources can result in educator frustration and failed implementation. Schools that integrate high-quality supports are better positioned to meet the diverse needs of military-connected students.

Resource Spotlight: The blog post Educators Can Use Existing Initiatives to Support Military-Connected Students from the Clearinghouse offers real-world insights into the daily challenges military-connected students face and examines how educators can help. Drawing from the SPEAK Military Children project, the post outlines four key initiatives that support school transitions: Advance Enrollment, the Interstate Compact, the Military Student Identifier, and the Purple Star School Program. Through research and interviews across all 50 states and the District of Columbia, the project revealed promising outcomes such as reduced family stress and improved student belonging, but it also highlighted implementation gaps and barriers. The blog encourages school personnel to understand how these initiatives work in their own state and to actively help families navigate them.

Action Plan: Implementing Sustainable Strategies

A strong action plan turns vision into practice. This plan should outline specific goals, timelines, and accountability structures. Teams should meet regularly to monitor progress, troubleshoot barriers, and make course corrections as needed. Embedding this plan into existing systems can reduce redundancy and increase sustainability.

Resource Spotlight: The Month of the Military Child Toolkit for Schools, developed by the White House’s Joining Forces initiative in collaboration with the Departments of Defense, Education, and Veterans Affairs, is a comprehensive planning resource that helps schools turn intention into action. Designed to raise awareness and foster school-wide engagement, the toolkit includes ready-to-use classroom activities, school-wide event ideas, and sample messaging to support military-connected students throughout April (Month of the Military Child) and beyond. With options tailored for all grade levels, it also highlights strategies for building community, honoring service, and supporting military-connected students as they face unique challenges such as caregiving changes or frequent relocation. Schools can use the toolkit to scaffold a sustainable action plan aligned with their goals and available resources.

Summary: Using the Lippitt-Knoster Model to Create Lasting Change for Military-Connected Students

When schools apply the Lippitt-Knoster Model as a framework for supporting military-connected students, they are better equipped to move from fragmented efforts to a coherent system of support. By attending to vision, consensus, skills, incentives, resources, and action planning, schools can foster environments where military-connected students and all students can learn to navigate transitions, overcome adversity, and thrive.

For additional evidence-informed strategies, tools, and implementation supports, visit the School Resources website from the Clearinghouse.

 

Implementing MTSS in Secondary Schools: A Guide to Using the Lippit-Knoster Model for Managing Complex Change

Graphic breaking down the Lippitt-Knoster Model.
Caredda, S. (2020). The Lippitt-Knoster Model for Managing Complex Change.

Implementing a Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) in secondary schools can be challenging but rewarding, and it can offer comprehensive benefits to students and staff. The Lippit-Knoster Model for Managing Complex Change provides a systematic guide for MTSS implementation by focusing on six essential elements: vision, consensus, skills, incentives, resources, and an action plan. Addressing each of these components can eliminate common obstacles to change and foster a supportive school environment (Knoster, 1991; Reynolds, 2023).

Why MTSS Matters in Secondary Education

Secondary schools have unique challenges when it comes to MTSS implementation, including the complexity of student needs and a more rigid schedule with multiple class transitions. MTSS offers a structured approach to address these, benefiting students academically, behaviorally, and socially. Below, we outline how each element of the Lippit-Knoster Model applies to MTSS in secondary settings, with practical steps and resources.

Vision: Establishing Purpose and Scope

A well-defined, shared vision is foundational to MTSS success. As Jimerson, Burns, and VanDerHeyden (2016) emphasize, an unclear vision can hinder MTSS implementation, especially in high schools that have complex student needs. For instance, a high school’s MTSS vision might focus on reducing dropout rates, increasing graduation rates, or supporting student mental health. Aligning MTSS with school goals ensures the MTSS model is tailored to student needs, so its outcomes will be impactful.

Resource Spotlight: The Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education’s MTSS resources offer exemplary guidance on implementing MTSS, which can be customized to individual school priorities (Briesch et al., 2020).

Consensus: Building a Collaborative Culture

Achieving consensus is vital for fostering a collaborative environment in which teachers, students, parents, and administrators support MTSS goals. An effective strategy for building consensus is “data storytelling,” which frames school data in meaningful ways. Visual and narrative presentations of data can help convey the purpose and benefits of MTSS and can help build a shared understanding and commitment (Curry, 2021).

Resource Spotlight: Edutopia’s guide to consensus-building strategies for school leaders provides frameworks for creating data stories that resonate with diverse audiences. Education Week created charts are based on Panorama’s State of MTSS 2023 Survey. Consider using these as the foundation, along with your school’s data, to tell your MTSS story.

Skills: Equipping Educators for MTSS Success

Equipping educators with the right skills is essential for the effective implementation of MTSS, which relies on a set of specific competencies across various roles within the school. These include skills in using data analysis, identifying and administering tiered interventions, and adapting instruction to meet diverse student needs. The Lippit-Knoster Model emphasizes that having the necessary skills can help to relieve staff anxiety and uncertainty, which are common barriers to successful MTSS adoption. A well-structured professional development program that is tailored to MTSS competencies can ensure educators feel confident and prepared to apply MTSS effectively in the classroom.

Resource Spotlight: The MTSS training series by School Resources to Support Military-Connected Students offers short, focused MTSS training sessions that are helpful for working with diverse student populations.

Incentives: Motivating Engagement and Participation

Offering incentives can help foster engagement with MTSS by highlighting its positive impacts on school culture and student outcomes. For example, using Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS), which aligns with MTSS principles, can demonstrate how structured support may decrease disciplinary incidents and enhance the school climate. Studies like Elrod et al. (2021) show that PBIS’s focus on positivity and support correlates with fewer behavior incidents and improved teacher buy-in.

Resource Spotlight: Data from studies, such as those on PBIS effectiveness, can serve as incentives for educators by illustrating the tangible benefits of MTSS implementation.

Resources: Ensuring Comprehensive Support Systems

A successful MTSS model requires a strategic alignment of resources to support students and educators across all tiers of intervention. The Lippit-Knoster Model emphasizes the importance of accessible resources and notes that missing resources can lead to frustration and implementation challenges. According to Reynolds (2023), schools that prioritize strategic resource planning experience smoother MTSS integration and encourage staff to remain focused on student outcomes rather than logistical issues.

Resource Spotlight: The Continuum of Evidence by the Clearinghouse for Military Family Readiness at Penn State is a helpful tool that categorizes interventions by efficacy and target demographics. Additionally, evidence-based intervention platforms such as What Works Clearinghouse and Evidence for ESSA provide rigorous evaluations of interventions, allowing schools to select the most effective, research-backed programs.

Action Plan: Charting a Path for Sustainable MTSS Implementation

Creating and using a detailed action plan can be essential for sustaining MTSS implementation. The MTSS Center’s planning guides for middle and high schools outline critical considerations and offer guiding questions tailored to each educational level. These documents are helpful for planning phases, structuring interventions, and evaluating progress, which can help to ensure MTSS remains adaptable to school-specific needs.

Resource Spotlight: The MTSS Center’s action plan documents help organize implementation strategies that are tailored to meet the unique needs of middle schools and high schools.

Summary: Using the Lippit-Knoster Model to successfully implement an MTSS framework

The Lippit-Knoster Model provides a structured framework for managing MTSS implementation in secondary schools. Addressing vision, consensus, skills, incentives, resources, and action plans helps establish a robust foundation for MTSS that can be sustained over time. When fully implemented, MTSS improves student academic and behavioral outcomes and fosters a positive, inclusive school environment where students and staff thrive together.

Next Steps and Resources

Ready to implement MTSS? The MTSS Check-Up is a flexible toolkit that allows school personnel to create an MTSS framework that is effective for their needs.

Have you tried implementing MTSS at your school? Share your experiences and insights with us here.

Reference(s):

Briesch, A. M., Chafouleas, S. M., Nissen, K., & Long, S. (2020). A review of state-level procedural guidance for implementing multitiered systems of support for behavior (MTSS-B). Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 22(3), 131-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300719884707

Curry, V. (2021, April 21). A consensus-building strategy for school leaders. Edutopia. https://www.edutopia.org/article/consensus-building-strategy-school-leaders

Durrance, S. (2023). Implementing MTSS in secondary schools: Challenges and strategies. Comprehensive Center Network. https://region6cc.uncg.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/ImplementingMTSSinSecondarySchools_2022_RC6_003.pdf

Elrod, B. G., Rice, K. G., & Meyers, J. (2021). PBIS fidelity, school climate, and student discipline: A longitudinal study of secondary schools. Psychology in the Schools, 59(2), 318-335. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22614

Jimerson, S.R., Burns, M.K., & VanDerHeyden, A.M. (2016). Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (2nd ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7568-3

Reynolds, K. B. (2023). Implementation of a multi-tiered system of supports in public schools to improve student behavior indicators and mental health (Doctoral dissertation, Southern Nazarene University). ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2809324280