Blog: Tag: military student identifier

Supporting Military-Connected Students in Schools: A Framework for Success

Learning, question and hands raised with girl in classroom for education, discussion and knowledge. Help, studying and teacher with children and woman at school for why, scholarship and answer

Most educators agree that supporting military-connected students is important. However, even with an available and growing collection of tips, toolkits, and resources, these efforts can lose momentum and/or lack cohesion over time. Schools often face challenges sustaining change, particularly when supports are not embedded into systems or reinforced through structured planning. For schools that are committed to making meaningful, lasting improvements, applying a research-based change model may offer the direction needed to translate intention into impact.

The Lippitt-Knoster Model for Managing Complex Change offers a framework that is grounded in organizational change theory. It identifies six key components necessary for successful and sustainable change: vision, consensus, skills, incentives, resources, and an action plan. When applied intentionally, these elements can help schools build an environment where military-connected students are consistently and effectively supported.

Why Supporting Military-Connected Students Matters

Military-connected students do not just attend schools located near installations. They are present in nearly every state and in many communities due to a variety of reasons, such as a parent’s retirement, a temporary relocation during a parent’s deployment, or a parent’s service in the National Guard or Reserves. These students often face challenging experiences such as school transitions, caregiver changes, and parental absences. Such changes can interfere with students’ academic continuity, social development, and emotional well-being. While these experiences are common among military-connected students, they are not exclusive to them. Many students face instability, separation from family members, or unexpected life changes. This overlap underscores the broader value of designing systems that intentionally support military-connected students. Doing so can lead to stronger practices that benefit all students as they navigate uncertainty.

Vision: Establishing a Clear Purpose

Developing and using a vision, which can include long- and short-term goals and/or guidance for strategic decision-making, provide the foundation for all coordinated school-based efforts. Establishing and adhering to a clearly articulated vision for supporting military-connected students can help ensure strategies are aligned with school-wide goals and frameworks, such as Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS). Vision, within the educational system, might include a commitment to identifying military-connected students upon enrollment, developing protocols for supporting transitions, or ensuring access to academic and mental health resources. Anchoring this work in the broader mission of the school promotes integration rather than isolation of military-connected initiatives.

Resource Spotlight: Mitigating the Impact of School Mobility: An Effective Practices Model and Guide for Educators by the Center for Public Research and Leadership at Columbia University helps schools establish a clear and actionable vision for supporting military-connected students. Rooted in research and developed through collaboration with educators nationwide, this guide outlines the academic and socioemotional risks of school mobility and introduces a comprehensive Mobility Mitigation Model. The model provides a systemic approach to school transitions by offering structured strategies across all phases—from pre-move planning to post-enrollment support. The guide includes adaptable tools, self-assessment rubrics, and a theory of action, and using these instruments can help school leaders embed military-connected supports into their broader mission. This resource could be important for schools that intend to move from fragmented practices to a unified, sustainable vision of support.

Consensus: Building a Supportive School Culture

Sustainable change requires buy-in from all stakeholders. Consensus ensures that educators, administrators, and school staff are aware of the vision and understand their role in advancing it. One evidence-informed method for building consensus is data storytelling. When schools use local data to contextualize the needs of military-connected students—such as differences in attendance, discipline referrals, or academic outcomes—they can generate urgency and foster empathy. Framing these data within the broader narrative of student success helps align stakeholder priorities and reinforces a shared purpose.

Resource Spotlight: Edutopia’s guide to consensus-building strategies for school leaders provides tools school leaders can use to engage diverse audiences in meaningful decision-making. These strategies are directly aligned with the Lippitt-Knoster element of consensus and offer practical techniques for presenting school data in compelling ways and for developing a shared understanding among staff and stakeholders.

Skills: Equipping Educators with the Right Tools

Without adequate training, staff may feel ill-prepared to support military-connected students. The Lippitt-Knoster Model emphasizes that skill gaps can lead to anxiety or confusion and can, ultimately, undermine implementation. Professional learning opportunities for educators should focus on the following: building awareness of military culture, understanding the common challenges faced by military families, and equipping staff to respond with evidence-based strategies. Training should be embedded in ongoing professional development cycles, and it should not be offered as one-time events in order to support capacity building and sustainability.

Resource Spotlight: The Clearinghouse for Military Family Readiness at Penn State (Clearinghouse) offers a series of training modules on supporting military-connected students. These modules include evidence-informed practices and frameworks that build educator capacity and address knowledge gaps around military culture and effective school-based interventions. This resource directly supports the development of skills necessary to implement and maintain effective programming for all students, especially military-connected students.

Incentives: Encouraging Buy-In

For change to be sustained, individuals must perceive value in their participation. Incentives, as conceptualized in the model, do not need to be monetary. Recognizing staff who demonstrate excellence in supporting military-connected students, celebrating student successes, or using data to highlight improvements are all ways to reinforce engagement. When educators see that their efforts produce tangible results, whether through improved student outcomes or a more inclusive school culture, they are more likely to continue investing their time, expertise, and energy.

Resource Spotlight: A recent professional learning literature review conducted by the Clearinghouse explores what educators report motivates them to engage in military-connected training. This resource helps school leaders understand what types of supports are valued by staff and how to structure professional development in ways that foster continued buy-in, which is key to sustaining momentum and investment.

Resources: Providing Support Systems

Change cannot be sustained without access to resources, even if a school has a strong vision and a motivated team. These resources include tools for identification, access to training, time for collaboration, and evidence-based intervention materials. The absence of these resources can result in educator frustration and failed implementation. Schools that integrate high-quality supports are better positioned to meet the diverse needs of military-connected students.

Resource Spotlight: The blog post Educators Can Use Existing Initiatives to Support Military-Connected Students from the Clearinghouse offers real-world insights into the daily challenges military-connected students face and examines how educators can help. Drawing from the SPEAK Military Children project, the post outlines four key initiatives that support school transitions: Advance Enrollment, the Interstate Compact, the Military Student Identifier, and the Purple Star School Program. Through research and interviews across all 50 states and the District of Columbia, the project revealed promising outcomes such as reduced family stress and improved student belonging, but it also highlighted implementation gaps and barriers. The blog encourages school personnel to understand how these initiatives work in their own state and to actively help families navigate them.

Action Plan: Implementing Sustainable Strategies

A strong action plan turns vision into practice. This plan should outline specific goals, timelines, and accountability structures. Teams should meet regularly to monitor progress, troubleshoot barriers, and make course corrections as needed. Embedding this plan into existing systems can reduce redundancy and increase sustainability.

Resource Spotlight: The Month of the Military Child Toolkit for Schools, developed by the White House’s Joining Forces initiative in collaboration with the Departments of Defense, Education, and Veterans Affairs, is a comprehensive planning resource that helps schools turn intention into action. Designed to raise awareness and foster school-wide engagement, the toolkit includes ready-to-use classroom activities, school-wide event ideas, and sample messaging to support military-connected students throughout April (Month of the Military Child) and beyond. With options tailored for all grade levels, it also highlights strategies for building community, honoring service, and supporting military-connected students as they face unique challenges such as caregiving changes or frequent relocation. Schools can use the toolkit to scaffold a sustainable action plan aligned with their goals and available resources.

Summary: Using the Lippitt-Knoster Model to Create Lasting Change for Military-Connected Students

When schools apply the Lippitt-Knoster Model as a framework for supporting military-connected students, they are better equipped to move from fragmented efforts to a coherent system of support. By attending to vision, consensus, skills, incentives, resources, and action planning, schools can foster environments where military-connected students and all students can learn to navigate transitions, overcome adversity, and thrive.

For additional evidence-informed strategies, tools, and implementation supports, visit the School Resources website from the Clearinghouse.

 

Educators Can Use Existing Initiatives to Support Military-Connected Students

Male teacher squatting down and smiling next to young male student in a classroom.

Did you know the 3rd grader with the military parent who is acting out in your class was in gifted programming at his old school and is acting out because he is bored? Did you know that the 11th grader in your French 1 class is in a bad mood, not because she has an attitude problem, but because your school does not offer the foreign language that she took for 2 years at her last school? What about the girl who transferred in a month after school started? Have you noticed that she keeps a positive attitude despite missing cheer tryouts this year because, by the time her family moved to your school, tryouts were over, and the season had started?

States have made great strides in the last 15 years in their understanding and support of military-connected students. However, a lot of variability exists regarding how supports are implemented in different states and different schools. The Clearinghouse for Military Family Readiness at Penn State (Clearinghouse) gained this insight through its work on the SPEAK Military Children project, funded by the Department of Defense’s Defense-State Liaison Office. This project looked at the implementation of four initiatives across all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

  • Advance Enrollment – Allows military families to enroll their children in schools based on military orders rather than proof of residency.
  • Interstate Compact on Educational Opportunity for Military Children – Addresses challenges related to school transitions, such as credit transfers, graduation requirements, and extra-curricular activities.
  • Military Student Identifier – A federally mandated data point that asks families in public schools about their military status.
  • Purple Star Schools Program – Recognizes schools that implement military-friendly policies and programs.

Clearinghouse scientists conducted this project in three phases: (1) a review of the literature related to military-connected students; (2) an analysis of state-level laws and regulations related to the four initiatives; and (3) interviews with national-, state-, and local-level stakeholders, including school personnel, military parents, and installation personnel.

Participants report a variety of positive outcomes related to the four initiatives. These outcomes include less stress on families, increased extra-curricular participation, better-prepared schools, more on-time graduations, increased feelings of belonging, and increased opportunities for military-connected students. These factors are important for family well-being, which impacts Service members’ mission readiness.

However, we also found differences across states in laws and regulations related to the initiatives. Furthermore, participants discussed barriers such as inconsistent policy implementation, lack of awareness among school personnel and parents, and variations in compliance with the laws and regulations.

School personnel have an important role to play in helping military-connected students and their parents navigate the four initiatives. You can help military families by doing the following:

  • Find out which initiatives are available in your state.
  • Understand how the initiatives are implemented in your state and how their implementation may be different from other states.
  • Help families understand how the initiatives are implemented in your state and in your school.
  • Understand that, even if your state has the initiative, families may be coming from a state that did not have the initiative or from a state that implements the initiative differently.

Many states have implemented the four initiatives, and many states and schools share the goal of supporting miliary-connected students. With continued support from policymakers and school personnel, military-connected students can successfully adapt to their new school environment and thrive. If you would like additional information on how you can support military-connected students, the School Resources to Support Military-Connected Students website offers several free training modules.

More information on the literature regarding miliary-connected students’ educational success, the laws and regulations related to the four initiatives in each state, and people’s experiences with local implementation is available on the project webpage.

Jennifer Karre, Ph.D., is a research and evaluation scientist at the Clearinghouse. In this role, she has been evaluating programs and policies for nearly 15 years. She was the project lead for the SPEAK Military Children project.